by Christopher Bollyn

I often wonder why young Americans do nothing to protest the outrageous criminal regime that has taken control of the United States.  Where is the resistance?  Two illegal wars, a growing police state, and several trillion dollars stolen by criminal bankers from the American people in the past year alone — why aren’t they protesting, resisting – burning tires in the streets?

Why are Americans unable to protest against the criminal regime that has taken over their nation?  Here French farmers protest low grain prices in Paris on October 16, 2009.  Why don’t we see such protests against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or against the trillion dollar rip-off for the big bankers?  Why is the resistance in the U.S. completely unorganized?

Having grown up during the Vietnam War, I was immersed in the protest movement and vibrant anti-war music and culture of the 1960s.  “Lucky Man” by Emerson, Lake, and Palmer is a good example of the anti-war music of the time.  I find it odd that there is no similar anti-war movement or music today.  Faced with never-ending wars in the Middle East, today’s youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical.

During the years that I attended public school, the United States was engaged in an undeclared war of aggression in Southeast Asia that nobody really understood.  Every week, the American people saw actual photos from the war in LIFE magazine and could easily see through the deception that we were fighting “communism”.   After 8 years of war in Afghanistan and 18 years in Iraq, however, there is no similar photo-journalism of comparable quality coming from the “embedded” journalists covering these wars.  Likewise, there is virtually no anti-war music or protest movement against the criminal wars being fought in our name.   Why?

We have to look at the media to understand the lack of a similar anti-war movement in the United States.  Today, there is no mass resistance because the U.S. media is now completely owned and controlled by Zionist Jews who actually support the fraudulent “War on Terror” and the illegal wars being fought by the United States and its allies.  These wars are being waged to benefit Israel and strengthen the Zionist hegemony in the Middle East and Central Asia.  The Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States now works full time to promote the war agenda – first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran.  In the Zionist-controlled media there is no room for any real criticism of the Zionist war agenda.

Paul Wolfowitz, one of the senior U.S. officials who conspired and planned the wars of aggression against both Afghanistan and Iraq, is now pushing for war against Iran in the pages of the Financial Times (U.K.), for example.  It needs to be understood that Wolfowitz is guilty of the most serious war crime, “a crime against peace” as defined by the Nuremberg Principles.  That his opinion is published in a leading financial paper illustrates my point that the mass media actively promotes the Zionist war agenda.  Wolfowitz has strong connections to the state of Israel.  He lived in Israel as a teenager when his Polish-born father, Jacob, worked at the Technion, and his sister, Laura, married an Israeli and lives in Jerusalem.

The controlled media today censors and sanitizes the images and information about the wars and the human suffering the aggression has caused to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.  The public is kept in the dark about the true costs of the illegal wars, both human and financial.  Most importantly, the U.S. media keeps powerful images like these from the Vietnam and Iraq wars off the pages of our newspapers.

The famous photo of Vietnamese children burned with napalm changed U.S. public opinion about the war.

The photo of a summary execution by a South Vietnamese police chief showed the lawlessness of the war.

The U.S. evacuates after the fall of Saigon

After nearly 19 years of fighting and bombing Iraqis, very few images of the human cost of the war have been published.  The ones that have been seen are horrible beyond belief and reveal the criminal nature of the war of aggression.

A photo from the “Highway of Death” shows what happened to one of the thousands of retreating Iraqis who were incinerated by a U.S. gas-air MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) in 1991.

A U.S. Marine killing injured Iraqis in a mosque in Fallujah, November 13, 2004 (NBC/AP)

The Vietnam war was being fought, we were told, to keep Southeast Asia from falling to the communists.  Thousands of young men, including several of my relatives, went to Vietnam to fight “communism”.  Many thousands of young Americans died in Viet Nam.  An untold number of Vietnamese died.

Vietnam eventually did fall to the communists and the last U.S. personnel had to flee from the roof of the embassy in Saigon with desperate people being pushed off the over-crowded helicopters.  Despite the fact that the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam, the world did not come to an end.  As a matter of fact, nobody even seemed to notice.  Most people were simply glad the 12-year old war was over.

I have often wondered why today’s youth seem utterly unable to resist the blatant lies of the criminal government and controlled media, which are clearly extremely harmful to them and their nation.  I can’t understand why the young people in America and Europe abuse themselves with tattoos and body piercings.  Don’t they care about themselves?  I have seen people with screws coming through their eyebrows that look like construction accidents that should be sent to the nearest emergency room. 

Christopher J. Petherick, the former chief editor of the Spotlight andAmerican Free Press, a weekly newspaper I wrote for in Washington, D.C., had an ugly metal stud sticking through his tongue that looked absolutely awful.  I had never seen such a thing.  He told me that he was a Satanist.  I thought he was just an East Coast trendie.  I sometimes told him that we were doing the Lord’s work by spreading the Truth.

Christopher J. Petherick, a self-avowed Satanist, was the editor ofAmerican Free Press and the former Spotlight, publications of the Liberty Lobby of Washington, D.C.  It makes no sense that a Satanist would be the chief editor of a newspaper that is purportedly written for patriotic Christian Americans, unless one understands that the Liberty Lobby is actually owned and controlled by a Zionist Jew named Mark Lane.  The paper is a controlled opposition outlet that acts like flypaper to create a list of active patriots — for the Jewish intelligence organization Lane works for.

Petherick fired me after a three-man team of heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me in front of my family, but only after collecting many thousands of dollars from readers for the Bollyn “legal defense fund,” which were kept by the so-called employee owned newspaper.  I later discovered that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane, and have been since the early 1990s when he bought the assets of Liberty Lobby with some of the $5 million he had been paid by Willis A. Carto in legal fees.

I learned this from L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics of Cincinnati.  Patterson’s newsletter is similar to the publications of the Mark Lane’s Liberty Lobby, which is what led Lane to sue Patterson in the mid-1990s for some $10 million.  Lane, a Zionist Jew, wanted to have a monopoly in the patriotic newspaper business.  During the legal process Patterson learned that Lane had acquired the assets of the nearly bankrupt Liberty Lobby in the early 1990s.  Manfred Roeder, a German patriot who has been imprisoned often in occupied Germany, told me that such controlled opposition newspapers like National Zeitung are designed to skim the cream off of the nationalist movement.  They also serve as outlets of disinformation and have even more sinister purposes.

Jane Fonda and Mark Lane worked closely together in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War.  Lane, who served in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany, owns the assets of Liberty Lobby andAmerican Free Press.

As the U.S. prepared for war in Kuwait and Iraq in the summer of 1990, I began organizing pro-Palestinian students at the University of California at Santa Cruz who were opposed to the war effort.  I learned a great deal through my anti-war efforts.  I saw how the anti-war movement was taken over by Jewish students from the Hillel organization (B’nai B’rith).  The issue of occupied Palestine was pushed to the side.  This is what controlled opposition means:  controlling both sides of the debate to control the message.

James B. Phillips, a devout Catholic and dear friend from Chicago who served in Vietnam, recently sent me a video from the mid-1980s that explains how Americans have been demoralized and why.

James B. Phillips, (top row, 3rd from left) commanded a U.S. rifle platoon in Viet Nam.

The information comes from a former agent of the Soviet K.G.B. who defected to the United States.

The former K.G.B. agents says:  “Exposure to true information does not matter anymore.  A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.  The facts tell nothing to him.”

This is exactly the problem we face in 2009.  Although Americans have the information that proves that their government has not been elected and is lying to them about 9-11 and everything else, the people do nothing to resist.  They have become enslaved to lies.  This video explains how this was done.

As the former Soviet journalist Yuri Bezmenov says in the video clip about the KGB’s demoralization of American youth through the media, “Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes…. It has nothing to do with espionage… in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American [so] that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews.  This is a statement of fact and should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.  Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres.  They have taken control of the media for one reason – to manipulate public opinion by controlling the message.  It is the same with media as with pipelines:  He who owns the pipeline controls the product.

Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization of Freemasons, the International Order of B’nai B’rith.  Philip Morris Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international president of B’nai B’rith.  The Sulzberger family who owns the New York Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B’nai B’rith, which was started in New York City in 1843.  It is through this secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people while living among them.

The B’nai B’rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early 1900s.  The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes.  The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States.  The B’nai B’rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States.  Through their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of Zion of the B’nai B’rith are able to push their agenda into every community and college campus in America.  The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is certainly not a “hoary fake”, and is most likely the protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B’nai B’rith.

Bezmenov’s statement about the KGB being primarily occupied with disinformation and demoralization efforts aimed at Americans through the media is similar to the analysis by the German intelligence expert, Andreas von Bülow, who told me that 90 percent of the work done by the CIA and other intelligence agencies is disinformation and deception.

It needs to be understood that communism and Zionism are fraternal twins from the same mother — big Jewish capital of the Rothschild sort.  This relationship can be seen in Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, the most senior advisers of President Barack Hussein Obama II.  Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, and Axelrod, the son of Jewish communists, were commissioned in 1992 by the daughter of Jewish financier Philip Morris Klutznick of Chicago to make Obama our “first black president.”  Zionism and communism are two heads of the same evil beast.

Communism and Zionism emerged together in the Russian Empire in the late 1800s.  There were six communist parties, two of which were also Zionist.  Although the Rothschild family who created the state of Israel is capitalist, the Russian Jews who emigrated to Palestine in the late 1800s and early 1900s were ardent communists and socialists.  Most of the Ashkenazi (Khazar and Slavic) Jews who built the Zionist state and who run it to this day come from the communist and Zionist parties that created the kibbutz and moshav settlements in Palestine.  The Jews who were forced to emigrate to Palestine (later Israel) and the millions of people who have lived under communism are similar.  Zionists and communists are both merely the pawns of the Rothschilds; foot soldiers for international Jewish bankers.

by Michael Gaddy

As a government grows more and more intrusive on individual liberties, that government’s fear of the armed citizen increases exponentially, just as an armed robber fears a well-armed potential victim. Here in America in the last seventy plus years, our government and their stooges in the media have sought to relegate the right of a free people to keep and bear arms into a privilege, subject to government approval, rather than an inalienable right. Sadly, many gun owners have agreed to participate in this madness.

I have been consistent in my objections to asking permission and paying for the privilege to carry a weapon on my person, if and when I chose to do so. Yet, the majority of objections I receive to my position come from people who currently own guns and have jumped at the opportunity for government approval to do what they already have the right to do. Is this not an open acknowledgement to those in power the Second Amendment, and the remainder of the Bill of Rights, mean nothing and are subject to the whim of some elected criminal, bureaucrat, or an agenda wearing a black robe?

When I decided to write this article, I did not contact the government, submit to a background check, submit fingerprints, take a government endorsed writing class and pay for permission. What is the difference in the exercise of my inalienable right to free speech and my inalienable right to keep and bear arms? The difference is: the state currently fears my ability to resist tyranny with a firearm more than with words, but as we can see from the reaction of the government and its media lackeys to the spoken objections to the tyranny of socialized medicine, that is about to change.

In today’s political climate, if one dares to speak out about the intrusion of the state into every crevice of liberty and freedom, they are compared by the socialist mouth organ to Nazis, Hamas and Hezbollah.

If the First Amendment rights follow the pattern of the Second Amendment, only those who have been vetted by the state will be allowed to speak or write publicly, and then only after passing the prerequisite courses, state scrutiny, and of course, pay the required amount for the privilege.

I can see the stooges proudly proclaiming their newly paid-for right to speak and write, just as they do now with their permits to carry a concealed weapon. Then, many will lobby for reciprocity from other states the right to speak or publish, or perhaps even campaign for a national permit to exercise their First Amendment rights.

An American, exercising his inalienable right to keep and bear arms, recently became the focus of the state and the media in New Hampshire near where Obama was to appear. Chris Matthews and other members of the propaganda ministry were apoplectic. How dare anyone other than a government bottom feeder be allowed near the Messiah with a firearm? What would have happened had this man decided to exercise his First Amendment rights at the same time he was exercising his Second?

What did the state and the media fear most about this man with a gun? Was it the man, the gun, the spirit of the man, or perhaps it might have been his ethnicity? After all, according to the media, if he were there to object to the socialist plans of Obama that would reveal his latent racism. We all know, white people concerned about government taking over their health care want to shoot anyone who is only half white.

What a masterstroke it was for the state to get Boobus to admit the only rights he has are those subject to the“reasonable” restrictions of his masters. The precedent has been set and we have agreed; you must submit yourself before the god called government, pass their background checks, take their approved qualification course, submit the required monies and wait for your ID card certifying you have permission from the state to exercise at least one of your former inalienable rights!

If you, and/or a member of your family, are assaulted by a madman with a weapon while in a restaurant, on a school campus, in church, at the mall, in a bank, in the parking lot where you shop or work, in a carjacking or a mugging, or visiting Obama’s home town, you must remember, the only people allowed to defend their lives and those of their loved ones are those who have been sanctioned by the state to do so. That is freedom in America today, granted by the state, bought and paid for.

Through our inactions and apathy we have acknowledged the state to be the masters of our lives; perhaps we can apply for the privilege of having our own health care, the right not to be forcibly injected by some vaccine whose side effects are worse than the disease or the right not to be imprisoned in a FEMA camp. Remember, we traded our rights for security. It is turning out to be one heck of a bad bargain.

Resistance, anyone?